An Eye for an Eye - Sunday Class - 1/31/2016

2685_eye-02.jpg

22_ac.pdf

21_rabbi_yy_jacobson_sunday_class_01312016.mp4

21_rabbi_yy_jacobson_sunday_class_01312016.mp3

mishpatim

emor

an eye for an eye

revenge

Why the Discrepancy Between the Written and Oral Traditions of Judaism?

An Eye for an Eye?

In the midst of a Gemarah class, Rabbi YY Jacobson explores the Torah&#39;s view on slavery, both when you obtain a Jewish and non-Jewish slave, and a deeper understanding of why we make blessings before we eat and drink. 
&nbsp; 
This discussion took place on Friday Parshas Matos-Masei, 1 Av, 5779, August 2, 2019, at the Ohr Chaim Shul, Monsey, NY.

7093_depositphotos_2510286_xl_2015.51c3.jpg

21_7093_rabbi_yy_jacobson_slavery_in_judaism.78f5.mp4

21_7093_rabbi_yy_jacobson_slavery_in_judaism.78f5.mp3

slavery

blessing on food

When We Make a Beracha on Food, We Don't Redefine the Food; We Redefine Ourselves

Hashkafah

Slavery in Judaism

Some of the commandments in the Torah dance off the pages in their sheer moral beauty. Some of them are difficult to grasp. Our portion, Emor, includes one of the latter type:&nbsp;Priests with physical disabilities were barred from performing their duties.

Do we not find this deeply disturbing?&nbsp;The Torah was the first book to enshrine in its code the unwavering dignity of every human person. In Jewish law, there is absolutely no distinction between murdering a perfectly healthy, strong human and a bed-ridden cripple. The dignity of life is unwavering and beyond utilitarian purpose. How then does the Torah &ndash; the first champion of the notion that physical prowess, handsome looks, and perfect shape, albeit wonderful blessings and gifts&mdash;are not barometers for dignity&mdash;legislate such a law? How can the Torah contradict itself, claiming that the most blemished of bodies and the most perfect of bodies are equal in the eyes of G-d, yet the crippled Kohen may not work in the Holy Temple? It seems like a smack in the face of everything Judaism teaches about compassion and loving-kindness?

Let me offer an insight by one of the great halachik authorities and spiritual masters of his day, Rabbi Menachem Mendel of Lubavitch, known as the Tzemach Tzedek (1789-1866). It required an introduction on an important principal in Judaism: What is perfection? Does Judaism have a perfect model?

Someone asked me, why are women treated in your synagogue as second-class citizens and not given an Aliya? Why don&rsquo;t they don tefilin or a tallit? Why no kippa?

The story of how Steve Jobs was abandoned by his biological parents; the story of a cognitively challenged child in Brooklyn who scored a home run and it became the happiest day in his life; the story of a father who ran the marathon with his crippled son; the story of the man who revolutionized our treatments of the paraplegic&mdash;all illustrate the unique mission entrusted to the handicapped Kohen.

7511_depositphotos_5874395_xl_2015.0ac1.jpg

kohanim

women

lunar

disability

cripple

moon

women in judaism

Why Are Women Barred from Many Jewish Rituals? Why Are Crippled Priests Deprived from Serving in the Temple?

Essay Emor

Why Discriminate Against Handicapped Kohanim?

This class was presented to women on Tuesday Parshas Emor, 13 Iyar 5777, May 9, 2017 at Ohr Chaim shul in Monsey, NY

4239_boys_learning_b_w_topaz2_enhance.e8fc.png

21_womens_class_5_9_17_parshas_emor_5777.4db9.mp4

21_womens_class_5_9_17_parshas_emor_5777.4db9.mp3

children

anger

acharei

education

apathy

chinuch

shmini

How Do You Know When You Are Hearing Real Wisdom? When You Feel that You Always Knew It

Three Myths About Education: Dealing with Angry, Addicted and Depressed Youth

During the Second Temple Period, a fierce controversy raged concerning the date for bringing the springtime offering of barley, called the Omer. (An omer is a measure of volume, around 86 ounces; this was the amount of barley flour baked and then brought in the Temple as a meal offering.) The verse says the Omer is to be offered &quot;on the day after the Shabbos,&quot; but which Shabbos? According to the Oral Tradition, this &#39;Shabbos&#39; is the first day of the Passover holiday. The Boethusians rejected this tradition.

What was the underlying argument between the Boethusians and the Sages? The class explores the views of three giants of the past century. It comes down to the question, can man really touch and embrace the Divine?

2401_unnamed.jpg

22_source sheets sefirah 5775 morrow of shabbos.pdf

21_rabbi_yy_jacobson_the_debates_between_the_tzedukim_and_the_sages.mp4

21_rabbi_yy_jacobson_the_debates_between_the_tzedukim_and_the_sages.mp3

shavuos

suducess

sefirah

sefiras haomer

meir don plotzky

klei chemdah

tzedukim

rabbi kook

The Views of Rabbi Meir Don Plotzky, Rabbi Avraham Yitzchak Kook & the Lubavitcher Rebbe

Sefirah/Shavuos Class

The Morrow of the Shabbos: The Dispute Between the Tzedukim and Chazal

The five challenges of living: Loss, illness, moral Impurity, finances & uncertainty. How the five Jewish holidays address the five most painful experiences of the human condition

57_heartpainh.jpg

22_ac_final_5771_version.pdf

emor_5769_revised.360p.mp4

emor_5769_revised.mp3

yom kippur

tumah

sukkos

ritual impurity

pesach

offering of gratitude

jewish holidays

blemishes

spiritual blemishes

bodily blemishes

financial stress

uncertainty

fear

illness

loss

death

rosh hashanah

How the Five Jewish Holidays Address the Five Most Painful Experiences of the Human Journey

The Five Challenges of Life: Loss, Illness, Failure, Financial Stress & Uncertainty

This women&#39;s class was presented on Tuesday Parshas Emor, 9&nbsp;Iyar, 5779, May 14, 2019 at the Ohr Chaim Shul, Monsey, NY

6319_depositphotos_65669313_xl_2015_edited.7052.jpg

22_ac_days_and_weeks_women_monsey_5779.9938.pdf

21_6319_rabbi_yy_jacobson_womens_sefirah_class_5779.0664.mp4

21_6319_rabbi_yy_jacobson_womens_sefirah_class_5779.0664.mp3

emotions

counting weeks

middos

trauma

counting of omer

inner work

john nash

suicide

spiritual growth

schizophrenia

thoughts

counting days

therapy

mental illness

Why We Count Days & Weeks: How to Confront Mental Illness, Depression and Trauma

Women's Sefirah class

It's a Beautiful Mind

The Story Behind a Curse: Embracing Your Unique Place in the World

109_holding_globe.cab5.png

22_emor_5770-0.pdf

Emor5770.360p.mp4

Emor5770.mp3

moshe

moses

shlomis bas divri

cursing g-d

jew cursing g-d

Embracing Your Unique Place in the World

The Story Behind a Curse

Why the Discrepancy between the Written and Oral Traditions of Judaism?

6196_41814_tumb_750xauto.32d6.jpg

halacha

corporal punishment

eye for an eye

torah morality

rabbi avraham yitzchak kook

written torah

oral torah

Essay Mishpatim/Emor

An Eye for An Eye? Really?

Two Extra Guests
A Jewish couple won the lottery. They immediately set out to begin a life of luxury. They bought a magnificent mansion in Knightsbridge and surrounded themselves with all the material wealth imaginable.
Then they decided to hire a butler. They found the perfect butler through an agency, very proper and very British, and brought him back to their home. The day after his arrival, he was instructed to set up the dining room table for four, as they were inviting the Cohens to lunch. The couple then left the house to do some shopping. When they returned, they found the table set for eight. They asked the butler why eight, when they had specifically instructed him to set the table for four? The butler replied, "The Cohens telephoned and said they were bringing the Blintzes and the Knishes."
Marriage of the High Priest
An astonishing and sobering contrast concerning the nature of the human psyche captures our imagination in this week’s Torah portion, Emor.
The Torah prohibits a Kohen, a priest (which includes all descendents of Aaron), from marrying a divorced woman. It also prohibits a Kohen Gadol, a High Priest, from marrying a divorcee and a widow (1). Now, one can perhaps make sense out of the former prohibition: Since a priest served as the spiritual agent of the Jewish people in Divine service, he was required to live a life of complete innocence and purity. Therefore, the Torah did not want him marrying a person involved in strife, innocent or not. But why could the High Priest not marry a widow? What is it about her husband's death that makes her unqualified to enjoy a blessed relationship with a Jewish High Priest? Several answers have been given to this question (2). In this essay I want to share with you one answer that I have always found extremely disturbing yet comforting, as it depicts how Judaism does not hide its face from the profound struggles confronting the human life. Abuse of spiritual power
Rabbi Chaim Yosef David Azulaei, an 18th century sage and mystic known in short as the Chida (3), presents the following interpretation in the name of the great 12th century Jewish pietistic sage, Rabbi Yehuda HaChassid (4). The High Priest of Israel was given many great spiritual powers. The most important of them was his duty on the holiest day of the year, Yom Kippur, to enter into the Temple's Holy of Holies, a place where no other living Jew was ever allowed to enter. On that charged day, the High Priest would also pronounce the intimate 72-letter name of G-d, which contained very profound powers. (The Jewish Sages intentionally ceased teaching that name during the period of the Roman conquest of Jerusalem, and it has since been forgotten.) Now, the Torah is concerned that the High Priest may experience infatuation with a particular married woman. What might he do about the fact of her being married? Next Yom Kippur, he will utilize the moment when he utterance G-d's ineffable name in order to bring about a decree of death on her husband (5). Thus he would be free to marry the widow. It is as a result of this concern that the Torah commands that a High Priest may not marry a widow. Even if he succeeds in getting rid of the husband, he would not be able to marry the wife. “Do not try pulling off this one,” the Torah informs the High Priest, “it won’t get you anywhere.” This is shocking idea. On the holiest day of the year, in the holiest place on earth, we are concerned that the man designated to serve in the highest spiritual and holiest position of Israel, while uttering the holiest syllables in the world, might harbor a craving to eliminate an innocent man so that he can marry his wife!
How can this be?
Angelic heights
Now, let us contrast this with another biblical statement concerning the High Priest entering into the Sanctuary on Yom Kippur, also from the book of Leviticus:
“No human being shall be in the Tent of Meeting when he [the High Priest] comes to provide atonement in the Sanctuary, until his departure (6).” Not only were there no Blintzes and Knishes allowed during the Yom Kippur service, but also no Cohen’s or any other people were allowed to be present at the time.
The Midrash (7),&nbsp;in its sensitivity to biblical nuance, wonders how can the Bible state that no human being should be present at the time of the High Priest’s service on Yom Kippur, when the High Priest himself was a human being? At least one man was present!
The Midrash answers that when the High Priest entered the Holy of Holies he was not human indeed; he assumed the status of a Heavenly Angel. Indeed, no human being entered the Sanctuary with him; not even his own.
What is going on here? We are confronted with an uneasy contradiction. One biblical source indicates the potential mind-staggering lowliness of a High Priest, capable of descending into the lowest depths of depraved behavior, while the other biblical source intimates his potential for enormous spiritual heights, capable of transcending the human experience and reaching angelic heights. How do we reconcile the two? Who is the High Priest, the holiest of the holy or the lowliest of the lowly? &nbsp;
Dust and image
Yet it is here we encounter, once again, Judaism’s moving perspective on the nature of the human being.&nbsp;There are two ways in which the Bible speaks of the creation of man. In the first chapter of Genesis, man is described as having been created in the image and likeness of G-d. In the second chapter, man is described as having been formed out of the dust of the earth. Together, image and dust express the polarity of the nature of man. He is formed of the most inferior stuff in the most superior image. The author of life and of mankind knew full well that sexuality holds men -- priests and lay men alike -- captive in its enormously powerful grip. Even the greatest of men are capable of falling prey to its momentous temptation. Even a High Priest, on the holiest day of the year, in the holiest space of the world, while uttering the holiest word in the world, is capable of thinking grotesque thoughts about how he can "bump a man off the road" so that he can&nbsp;lay his hands on his woman. Judaism has always been keenly sensitive to the truth that every human being has a demon lurking within. If you don't challenge and tame it each day anew, it can turn you into a monster; you are capable of ugliness in the least expected circumstances.
But the author of life also knew that the human person is capable of incredible greatness. The soul of man being a “fragment of G-d (8),”&nbsp;he or she&nbsp;is capable of generating infinite goodness and encountering within&nbsp;themselves infinite idealism. As Professor Abraham Joshua Heschel, a scion of the great Chassidic masters, once put it, “Man is a polarity of a divine image and worthless dust. He is a duality of mysterious grandeur and pompous aridity, a vision of G-d and a mountain of dust. It is because of his being dust that his iniquities may be forgiven, and it is because of his being an image that his holiness and idealism is expected.”
So, the next time you are overtaken by challenging cravings, addictions, temptations and any negative feelings, do not fall into despair. Remember, you are no worse than the High Priest of Israel! You, too, may struggle against horrible demons. But, you, too, may still enter into the Holy of Holies.
It is up to each of us to define who we are. The rest will become a self fulfilling prophesy.
1) Leviticus 21:7; 14. 2) See, for example, Sefer Hachenuch Parshas Emor; Mai Hasheluach vol. 2 Parshas Emor. &nbsp; 3) 1724-1806. The Chida, author of more than 50 volumes on Torah thought, was one of the great Torah luminaries of his day. He resided in Israel, Egypt and Italy. He quotes this interpretation in his book Penei David. The following explanation is also quoted in Moshav Zekanaim Al Hatorah (by the French 13th century authors of the Tosefot on the Talmud) in the name of “the Chassid. Parenthetically, in an Emor essay by Rabbi Yissachar Frond he quotes Rabbi Bergman as stating that the above mentioned “Chassid” quoted in Moshav Zekanim refers to The Rokeach (this is the 13th century German mystic and sage, Rabbi Eliezer Rokeach). Yet, based on the explicit reference given by the Chida, I think&nbsp;the Moshav Zekanim is referring to Reb Yehudah Hachasid. It should also be noted that the Chida himself rejects this interpretation in Penei David ibid. &nbsp; 4) Rabbi Yehuda HaChassid, who resided in Regensburg, Germany and authored the famed Sefer Chassidim, was known as one of the great kabbalists and Halachik authorities of his day. 5) This (according to one opinion in Midrash) is what Moses did when he wishes to kill the Egyptian who was beating a Jew (Exodus 2:14 and Midrash Tanchumah ibid. Quoted in Rashi ibid.) 6) Leviticus 16:17. 7) Midrash Rabah to Leviticus ibid. 8) Of course, not every High Priest was suspected of this. The ideal High Priest was a Tzaddik in the deepest sense of the word, whose challenges and struggles are of a different nature (see Tanya ch. 10 about the true definition of a tzaddik). Yet, throughout our history, there have been many High Priests of a lower caliber. 9) See Ramban to Genesis ch. 2; introduction to Shefa Tal (a 17th century major Kabbalistic work by Rabbi Shabsi Sheptel Horowitz); Tanya ch. 2.

<span style="font-size: 8.5pt; line-height: 130%; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;">Why could the High Priest not marry a widow?&nbsp;A daring interpretation by Rabbi Yehuda HaChassid teaches us how Judaism views human nature: our proclivity to moral failure, coupled with our ability for transcendence.&nbsp;

2800_split.jpg

kohen gadol

high priest

sexuality

A Vision of G-d and a Mountain of Dust

The Insanity of the Human Psyche

Likkutei Torah Parshas Emor Maamar Usfartem Lachem #1: Does G-d Need Us? Three Views. The Work of Polishing Your Emotions. This class was presented during Sefirah of 5776 (2016) in Monsey, NY.

4207_usfartem_main_image.985c.jpg

20_usfartem.6aad.pdf

19_gggg.289e.mp3

malchus

sefirat haomer

The Work of Polishing Your Emotions

Likkutei Torah Usfartem #1: Does G-d Need Us? Three Views

This advanced text-based class, a Sicha of the Lubavitcher Rebbe (Likkutei Sichos vol. 17 Parshas Emor), presented in 5771 (2011), explains the argument among the &ldquo;Chachmei Yisroel,&rdquo; the Scholars of Israel, if the prohibition to eat the new grain till the Omer offering was brought applies outside of the Holy Land. The Sicha sees the divergent views as stemming from two approaches to what we might call &ldquo;the psychology of inspiration.&rdquo; In the void of holiness, how do we effect a person? Do we try to recreate the holy reality in a diminished form? Or do we allow the person to experience the fullness of the void and thus create a new reality based on his imagination and yearning?

The Pyschology of Inspiration: Likuttei Sichos Emor

How Do You Confront a Void? Do You Replace It or Embrace It?

Class Summary:

Categories

Related Classes

Please help us continue our work

Sign up to receive latest content by Rabbi YY

Ways to get content by Rabbi YY Jacobson